A program that has been accredited should address the follow-up process, that is:
Two and a half years after obtaining the accreditation, the educational program shall report, using the Mid-Term Report, its progress and the goals achieved by addressing the previously proposed Improvement Plan to CACEI to address the recommendations issued in the accreditation decision.
The review, analysis, and assessment of mid-term reports is the exclusive responsibility of the Mid-Term Commission, which will be responsible for issuing the decision assessing compliance and attention to the recommendations made by CACEI in the accreditation decision.
The Mid-Term Committee is currently composed of three professionals who have extensive academic and practice background and experience in evaluation for accreditation.
Av. Presidentes 34B, Col. Portales Oriente
Del. Benito Juárez, México, D. F. C. P. 03570